Reading
Books mostly from 2023 onwards, with a few older favourites (click a cover to read my notes). Also here: essays and poems I found thought-provoking and keep returning to.
Non-Fiction

Empire of AI
2026
notesCareless People
2025
notesMother Mary Comes to Me
2025

Essays in Love
2025

Why We Sleep
2025

Reborn
2025

The Dream Machine
2025

Lab Hopping
2025

Intimations
2025
notesIn Other Words
2024

Lies Our Mothers Told Us
2023

Bird by Bird
2024

Trick Mirror
2024
Karen Hao's deeply reported account of OpenAI, from its idealistic origins to its transformation under Sam Altman. A National Book Critics Circle Award winner that reveals the human and environmental costs behind the AI race.
"It turns out the people running the world's largest social network weren't just calculated - they were often just careless."
An appalling first-hand look at the "move fast and break things" era of Facebook. It might not surprise you with new revelations about how Meta operates, but it is revolting to read about the sheer level of incompetence and genuine lack of care of the people at the top when the question is between impact on real humans versus the effect on these tech giants' bottom lines.
Wynn-Williams also dives into Sheryl Sandberg's brand of corporate feminism, and how in practice, the Lean In philosophy clashed directly with the reality of corporate self-interest within Meta itself. A must-read for anyone interested in tech policy, even if the writing occasionally lacks the depth I'd have appreciated more of.
"I learned that day that most of us are a living, breathing soup of memory and imagination - and that we may not be the best arbiters of which is which."
I devoured this book in two days, between moving things for housewarming, with the sort of intensity that my teen self had had that my current self has not displayed in years. There are two authors that I hold really close to my heart, and one of them is Arundhati Roy. I'd forgotten that she was not just any Indian author, that she was a Malayali who lived most of her adult life in Delhi, so the references in Malayalam, the locations in Delhi, added another layer of familiarity. I loved the rare insights into her closely guarded private life as much as I did learning about the creative processes behind most of her works. I had also forgotten that she could be equally as hilarious as she was intelligent, as vulnerable as she was ferocious - and that a writer could do all of this with the most deceptively simple-looking sentences possible.
A book that I felt very strongly about while reading it the first time in 2024, and one that has continued to stay with me since. In Other Words is an answer to why Jhumpa Lahiri abandoned writing in the English language (as a Pulitzer-winning author, might I add!) and her journey towards making Italian her own.
Her attempt to adopt the language felt like it mirrored the struggle many of us face, born into our mother tongues, as we sought (and continue to seek) to make English our home. Through her efforts to write in Italian, Lahiri examines the fundamental experience of extracting words from the difficult-to-describe realm of feeling and giving them material form on the page. This is something that would echo with everyone who has ever tried to express themselves and found their vocabulary heavily lacking.
Ultimately, In Other Words serves as Lahiri's personal "Why I Write." Wholeheartedly recommend this to people who love words, and are obsessed with picking the right ones.
Fiction

Exit West
2026

The Anthropologists
2026

The God of Small Things
2014
notesOur Friends in Good Houses
2025
notesMinor Detail
2025

White Nights
2025
I was drawn in by the title more than anything else. It stood out to me one day at Bahrisons: a novel from the perspective of a guy seeking "quiet anchorage" in short-term dwellings, while navigating an uncertain life (like all of us planted into metropolitan cities, away from our home towns).
I'm extremely conflicted about how I feel about this book. While I relate to the longing for a permanent solid ground that the author conveyed in very relatable prose, the narrative frequently shifts heavily into the protagonist's life as an investigative journalist in war zones. Worse, the text is thick with condescension for anyone the author-protagonist deemed beneath him. It's hard to stay invested in a search for "solid ground" when the narrator is too busy looking down on everyone else.
Despite being just around roughly more than a hundred pages, it took me close to a year to complete this book: the first half is haunting and tells with excruciatingly mundane detail something that happens to a female prisoner of war - which by itself wouldn't have stood out to the narrator when she comes across it in passing 25 years later, if not for a minor detail. The second part - written in what feels like a stream of consciousness as the narrator looks into the incident by retracing borders physically and emotionally - feels real, frantic, and finally, gut punching.
Essays
A photograph is not just the result of an encounter between an event and a photographer; picture-taking is an event in itself, and one with ever more peremptory rights - to interfere with, to invade, or to ignore whatever is going on. Our very sense of situation is now articulated by the camera’s interventions. The omnipresence of cameras persuasively suggests that time consists of interesting events, events worth photographing. This, in turn, makes it easy to feel that any event, once underway, and whatever its moral character, should be allowed to complete itself - so that something else can be brought into the world, the photograph.
Competitive university debating requires of its participants a particular intersection of personal qualities. You have to enjoy talking out loud in front of people. You need to have a taste for ritualized, abstract interpersonal aggression. You have to be willing to tolerate physical and mental discomfort: weekends of sleeplessness, bad food or no food, and interminable group conversations about how tired and ill everybody feels. And you have to learn how to lose.
Most of our platitudes notwithstanding, self-deception remains the most difficult deception. The charms that work on others count for nothing in that devastatingly well-lit back alley where one keeps assignations with oneself: no winning smiles will do here, no prettily drawn lists of good intentions.
The mere sight of a tea shop was intimidating for my teenage self. It was beyond unusual to see women of any age hanging out at a tea shop in Kerala. Shilpa Padhke talks about the need for women to look purposeful while occupying public spaces in her book, Why Loiter. Loitering is not a luxury women have in our country. They will be interfered with and interrogated in order to remind them of this rule if they are found to be behaving not in accordance with it; more so in the case of young women.
This is why the accepted rule in Kerala is that a woman has no business being in a tea shop. All the ‘respectable’ things women are allowed do not include socializing in the local tea shop.
Say you hear the sound of a twig snapping. You might not have noticed the twig before; you might have not noticed the pressure on the twig, how it was bent, but when it snaps, it catches your attention. You might hear the snap as the start of something. A snap is only the start of something because of what you did not notice, the pressure on the twig.
Suppose that you are angry on Tuesday because I stole from you on Monday. Suppose that on Wednesday I return what I stole; I compensate you for any disadvantage occasioned by your not having had it for two days; I offer additional gifts to show my good will; I apologize for my theft as a moment of weakness; and, finally, I promise never to do it again. Suppose, in addition, that you believe my apology is sincere and that I will keep my promise.
Could it be rational for you to be just as angry on Thursday as you were on Tuesday? Moreover, could it be rational for you to conceive of a plan to steal from me in turn? And what if you don’t stop at one theft: could it be rational for you to go on to steal from me again, and again, and again?
I’ve been emphasising here the small and the private, because essentially that’s what my work is about. One person writing in a quiet room, trying to connect with another person, reading in another quiet - or maybe not so quiet - room. Stories can entertain, sometimes teach or argue a point. But for me the essential thing is that they communicate feelings. That they appeal to what we share as human beings across our borders and divides. But in the end, stories are about one person saying to another: This is the way it feels to me. Can you understand what I’m saying? Does it also feel this way to you?
Poetry
“and are we not of interest to each other?”
“Joy is not made to be a crumb.”